Comparing the articles of Te Tiriti-o-Waitangi with the ACT Party’s proposed principles, Feb 2024
The ACT Party has proposed a ‘Treaty Principles Bill’ which they assert ‘would restore the mana of our founding document by ensuring it delivers what it originally promised in 1840: nga tikanga katoa rite tahi – the same rights and duties for all New Zealanders.’ They further explain:
The Treaty Principles Bill will not change the Treaty itself. That was set in 1840 and will remain forever. What we are seeking to do is continue the process of defining the Treaty principles, for the first time incorporating the voices of all people through a democratic Parliamentary process, instead of through the Tribunal or the courts.
See here for the source of these quotes and for further information from the ACT Party: https://www.treaty.nz/
The ACT Party have placed three proposed principles on their website and it is helpful to compare these proposed principles with the actual texts of both Te Tiriti-o-Waitangi and the Treaty of Waitangi. Please note that the principles that appear on the ACT Party website are not yet the text of the proposed 'Treaty Principles Bill.' However, these principles (which appear on their website) offer one an insight into their thinking.
Here is a table comparing ACT’s proposed principles with the text of the English Treaty of Waitangi.
https://www.archives.govt.nz/discover-our-stories/the-treaty-of-waitangi/what-te-tiriti-o-waitangi-says-in-english-and-te-reo-maori
Discussion
There are many things that can be said about the ACT Party’s proposals and those who specialise in Treaty/Tiriti jurisprudence will be able to add considerable detail. However, for now, the two points that I would make are these:
There are many things that can be said about the ACT Party’s proposals and those who specialise in Treaty/Tiriti jurisprudence will be able to add considerable detail. However, for now, the two points that I would make are these:
- The ACT Party’s proposed ‘principles’ rewrite the text of Te Tiriti/Treaty. Their statement which reads, ‘The Treaty Principles Bill will not change the Treaty itself. That was set in 1840 and will remain forever’ is disingenuous on their part. This is because, unlike the Treaty principles first proposed in the famous 1987 SOE Case, the ACT Party's so-called 'principles' will, in effect, replace the articles of Te Tiriti itself because (1) the three principles clearly relate and respond to the three existing articles; and (2) they are not principles, conceptually, in the same vein as those proposed in the 1987 SOE Case. Those principles include the following:
- The duty to act reasonably and in good faith
- Active Crown protection of Māori interests
- The government should make informed decisions
- The Crown should remedy past grievances
- The Crown has the right to govern (For source and further discussion, see here.)
- The ACT Party’s proposed ‘principles’ will extinguish particular rights granted 'ki nga rangatira, ki nga hapu' by removing these words altogether and by extending tino rangatiratanga to include all people, not just those who signed Te Tiriti and their descendants. ACT ignores the fact that the provisions of Article 2 in Te Tiriti were clearly to be enjoyed by Māori, particularly those who signed Te Tiriti. Article Two of Te Tiriti clearly confirms and guarantees in perpetuity pre-existing rights enjoyed by iwi/hapū/whānau communities throughout the country. If there are unusual, new and separate rights established through Te Tiriti, they were not those pre-existing rights already enjoyed by Māori ancestors but the new right created for the Crown of England to establish Kāwanatanga in this country. In the history of human settlement in Aotearoa and Te Wai Pounamu, it is the Crown's right to create Kāwanatanga that is new, unusual and separate.
(There are other things too that could be said - such as the way the proposed principles reduce tino rangatiratanga to a matter of property rights only when it relates to every aspect of the lifeways, culture and existence of the tangata whenua.)
Comments
Post a Comment